Asset Allocation and Risk Management
|
Asset Class
|
Large Accounts
|
Small Accounts
|
|
Bonds
|
28.60%
|
18.50%
|
|
Cash
|
12.80%
|
14.00%
|
|
Equities
|
57.10%
|
66.50%
|
|
Other
|
1.50%
|
1.00%
|
In researching for this paper I reviewed a number of specialized advisor and industry websites to identify what new thoughts are emerging for portfolio structure and risk management. To my surprise the US site Advisor Perspectives which aggregates the portfolio recommendations of advisors who subscribe to their information shows that as at November 2, 2008 current client asset allocation for large accounts of $1,000,000 and above as well as small accounts of $50,000 and less, the equity exposure is relatively unchanged from August. Surprisingly most advisors and their clients’ holdings are ignoring the fact that this is not a normal cyclical downturn, but is rather a systemic failure. Interestingly the smaller accounts on average have higher equity exposure. Using Perold’s approach in the current market volatility would reduce the equity risk exposure, something that we have been committed to encouraging.
Assessing Risk and the Potential for Volatility
With one in every five mortgages in the US currently in default, and potentially 40% worth less than their outstanding debt the US consumer is not in a position to continue to support the wanton spending spree of the last five or six years. Since 60% of US GDP is comprised of consumer spending, real contraction of the economy is likely before the sun rises in this market. In October MacDonald’s processed more credit card transactions than any other business in the US, pointing to the fact that more and more people do not have the cash to spend even on the cheapest of meals! A contraction in consumer spending will impact retailers, and by extension manufacturers in short order. October was the worst decline in new vehicle sales in 30 years, and this week Nortel is reported to be cutting a further 3000-5000 jobs based upon declines in sales orders in the telecom industry. Earnings outlooks are being slashed daily and are dragging down even stocks that have outperformed the analysts’ expectations.
It is interesting to observe that in a falling market with falling Central Bank lending rates that we are seeing surging credit risk spreads for corporate bonds. Current spreads are over 15% reaching the heady heights of the junk bonds crisis, with existing corporate bonds having been discounted significantly to reflect this yield. This is a double edged sword for non-registered accounts with interest yield being taxable while the real value is declining. There is much marketing promotion based upon these yields and claims that at current levels corporate bonds and high yield bond funds should form a part of everyone’s portfolio. While this case exists we have some real concerns that there may be an underestimation of the defaults that are sure to come in the face of reduced consumer spending and declining corporate profits which in turn will be further impacted by rising borrowing costs upon debt renewal. Just this week Barclays Bank PLC entered into a debenture agreement in which it will pay 15% interest and the lender has conversion warrants at a discount of 20% of the trading price. Dependent upon your risk tolerance some exposure may make sense, but this is not the time to bet the farm on high yield bonds.
Implications of Individual and Market Psychology
This week I have heard four statements that have concerned me. The first was “I want to hold until the fund comes back to the original cost then I will sell”. The second was “we haven’t actually made a loss unless we sell”. The third was “I just want to stay the course, markets always come back” and finally “They are too big to fail”. Tackling these in reverse order my answers are simple Washington Mutual and Lehman Brothers were giants, but they failed. Markets may recover but the NASDAQ never recovered from its bubble and many of its stocks have vaporized. The same is true for the Japanese Nikkei, which are both systemic corrections more akin to what we are seeing now. While it is true to say for tax purposes that we have not made a loss until we sell, lower stock values generally point to lower dividends and lower income, so the impact of loss is real even if unrealized. Finally our egos which do not want to admit to being wrong frequently causes us to hold losing stocks beyond their best by date. Compounding this problem is the “casino psychology” of increasing our bet so that we can make greater returns when “our number comes up”. Many Canadian held Nortel and added to those positions in the decline of its value from over $120, but today it trades for less than $2, AIG is the same and more will follow.
With some evidence that most advisors and their clients are still heavily weighted in the markets it is evident that “capitulation”, the turning point in the market where the “hurt” forces people to reduce their holdings, has not yet arrived. Combine this with the fact that while loans to AIG may be helping Wall Street the trickle down to Main Street is also not yet evident. Real Estate values in the US are projected to decline by another 15% to 20% from their current levels, depending on the analysis and source. What they all appear to agree upon is that until real estate values stabilize consumer confidence, which is at a record low, is unlikely to rebound. The Internaltional Monetary Fund (IMF) today said they expect the developed economies to shrink over the next year and possibly two. As a result our view becomes daily more defensive as we believe that markets will most likely behave more like 1929-1932 and still have a way to fall.
Our Value Proposition going forward
The current defensive position has reduced by over 50% the asset based compensation that we receive to support and service our clients. This may help explain why the other advisor asset allocation models remain so unchanged over these last few months, notwithstanding the greater volatility. We believe that our value proposition is defined in four parts:
1. Life Planning and Education to provide clients with the background and details to articulate their life and legacy objectives and understand their options and challenges to empower them to make informed decisions.
2. Integrated Financial Planning to bring together the cash flow required to support the desired quality of life through effective tax structuring and financial product integration, and addressing both incapacity and estate planning goals
3. To develop a portfolio strategy to manage risk-adjusted returns and that responds to economic and market conditions and is customized for the family’s risk model and financial plan
4. To research and recommend appropriate financial products including best of class managers and monitor their performance and continued suitability within the integrated financial plan
As we go forward the question is “Are we able to continue to deliver on each of these services?” The answer simply is “Yes we can!” However we would not be able to sustain these indefinitely based upon the current compensation model based exclusively upon residual asset based commissions so we are evaluating models that can continue to support the full spectrum advisory services that our clients value. I would like to thank those clients who have expressed both appreciation and concern for our team as we do our best to serve you all.
As we reflect on Remembrance Day of the sacrifices of the men and women around the world to overcome tyranny and oppression and the challenges for their families left behind, we see the spark of the good that is in mankind that is necessary to face the great challenges, to care for the neighbour and the stranger creating the belief that this world can overcome. Yes we can!
Best Regards,